Sh. Stall et al., COMPARISON OF 5 BODY-COMPOSITION METHODS IN PERITONEAL-DIALYSIS PATIENTS, The American journal of clinical nutrition, 64(2), 1996, pp. 125-130
Body-composition assessment is an important method of evaluating nutri
tional status in peritoneal dialysis patients. Because body-compositio
n measurement estimates have not been fully validated in this populati
on, we assessed five body-composition methods in 30 well-dialyzed peri
toneal dialysis patients. The techniques studied included bioelectrica
l impedance analysis, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, total-body pot
assium counting, and anthropometry by two techniques. The dialysis pat
ients were matched for age, race, sex, height, weight, and body mass i
ndex with 29 healthy control subjects in our laboratory database. By 5
x 2 x 2 analysis of variance, significant differences were found betw
een results by modality (P < 0.0001) as well as by sex, with women hav
ing an increased percentage of fat (P < 0.0001). However, there was no
significant intermethod difference by condition (peritoneal dialysis
or control). That is, although significantly different percentage fat
values were found between the body-composition techniques, this variab
ility was independent of whether the measurement was made on control o
r peritoneal dialysis patients. Despite the differences between modali
ties, all techniques were found to correlate significantly with each o
ther (P < 0.01 or better for men and P < 0.001 or better for women). O
ur experience shows that these routine techniques for measuring body c
omposition can be readily applied to stable peritoneal dialysis patien
ts.