MORE THOUGHTS ON THE PRACTICE OF ROUTINELY APPENDING RAW DATA TO REPORTS - RESPONSE

Authors
NAUGLE RI MCSWEENY AJ
Citation
Ri. Naugle et Aj. Mcsweeny, MORE THOUGHTS ON THE PRACTICE OF ROUTINELY APPENDING RAW DATA TO REPORTS - RESPONSE, Clinical neuropsychologist, 10(3), 1996, pp. 313-314
Citations number
4
Categorie Soggetti
Psycology, Clinical","Clinical Neurology",Psychology
Journal title
Clinical neuropsychologist → ACNP
ISSN journal
13854046
Volume
10
Issue
3
Year of publication
1996
Pages
313 - 314
Database
ISI
SICI code
1385-4046(1996)10:3<313:MTOTPO>2.0.ZU;2-V
Abstract
Our initial paper arguing against the practice of routinely appending raw data to reports of neuropsychological examinations (Naugle & McSwe eny, 1995) elicited two responses in favor of doing so (Freides, 1995; Matarazzo, 1995). This paper reviews the major points raised by those two writers and provides our responses to their objections. We contin ue to recommend that the type and amount of data to be included with a report be tailored to the needs and competency of the referral source who receives that report.