I develop and test the hypothesis that young venture capital firms tak
e companies pubic earlier than older venture capital firms in order to
establish a reputation and successfully raise capital for new funds.
Evidence from a sample of 433 IPOs suggests that companies backed by y
oung venture capital firms are younger and more underpriced at their I
PO than those of established venture capital firms. Moreover, young ve
nture capital firms have been on the board of directors a shorter peri
od of time at the IPO, hold smaller equity stakes, and time the IPO to
precede or coincide with raising money for follow-on funds.