Dc. Dahlin, TECHNOLOGY AND COURT ADMINISTRATION IN THE 21ST-CENTURY - HURTLING TOWARD, Technological forecasting & social change, 52(2-3), 1996, pp. 227-239
This article begins from the position that technology is a human creat
ion used to help achieve desirable ends. Therefore, to understand tech
nology's impact on court administration (defined as case processing su
pport to judicial decision-making), the ends or values to be realized
in court operation must first be specified. Seven case deciding values
(impartiality, finality, public participation and oversight, accurate
ly declaring and applying the law, protecting individual rights, being
fair and equitable in decisions, and preserving/strengthening politic
al community) are identified along with seven case support values (acc
ess, accurate information, equality of treatment, protection of privac
y, high quality of operation, efficiency, and accountability). Using t
his values framework, specific technological options and their possibl
e impacts are analyzed in terms of both the direct and indirect case p
rocessing support provided by court administration. In the area of dir
ect case processing support, the approach taken is to follow the flow
of a case from the point of thinking about beginning legal action thro
ugh post-trial proceedings. In the area of indirect case processing su
pport, the focus is on technology's impact on court organizational des
ign and management.