Younger Asian migrants-as interviewees and clients in the British inst
itutional context-primarily view their confrontation with `white' gate
keepers as one between their ethnic minority status and the cultural d
ominance of the majority. By calling into play their migrant status mo
re readily than their client status, they tend to interpret the perenn
ial mismatch between their socioeconomic needs and the institutional p
rocessing of those needs in terms of negative cultural stereotyping, a
head of institutional stereotyping. My main focus in this paper is two
fold: first, in order to explain why Asian migrants interpret institut
ional actions as discriminatory devices against their ethnicity, I app
eal to the broader sociohistorical context surrounding the migration p
henomenon itself; second, I draw attention to the structure of their a
ccounts of cultural discrimination-discursively realized as strategies
of consensus and contrast-in the context of gatekeeping encounters. B
y pointing out the limitations of an activity-based analysis of commun
icative mismatches in client-gatekeeper discourse, I argue that in ord
er to account for minority groups' discursive practices it is essentia
l that we supplement the pragmatic analysis of mismatches with a socio
-psychological analysis of 'self- and other-stereotyping' on the one h
and and institutional and cultural stereotyping on the other hand.