Mr. Kohn et al., DIRECTLY OBSERVED PREVENTIVE THERAPY - TURNING THE TIDE AGAINST TUBERCULOSIS, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine, 150(7), 1996, pp. 727-729
Objective: To compare compliance between directly observed preventive
therapy and daily treatment for students with inactive (class II) tube
rculosis. Design: Cohort analytic study and cost-effectiveness analysi
s. Students found to be positive for purified protein derivative and h
aving no abnormal chest x-ray films on mandated screening were advised
to have prophylactic treatment with isoniazid. Treatment was either d
irectly observed in the school health clinic or provided as daily ther
apy by the Department of Health. Treatment completion, age, sex, ethni
city, and recent immigration were compared between the 2 treatment gro
ups. Setting: A school-based clinic at an inner-city New York, NY, hig
h school. Results: In 1993, 864 students were screened. The positive p
urified protein derivative rate was 19.3%. All 161 students had negati
ve findings on chest x-ray films. Of the students, 105 (65.2%) were en
rolled in the school-based clinic directly observed preventive therapy
program, 22 were referred to the Department of Health for daily thera
py, and 34 were excluded from the study before treatment. The 2 treatm
ent groups did not differ in composition. Completion of therapy in the
directly observed preventive therapy group (87.6%) was significantly
greater than that in the daily therapy group (50%) (P=.001, chi(2)=11.
8) and that reported in the literature for programs other than directl
y observed preventive therapy (30%-70%). Directly observed preventive
therapy was administered by existing personnel without additional expe
nditure. Conclusion: Directly observed preventive therapy is an effect
ive strategy that should be used in the school clinic setting to incre
ase compliance with prophylactic treatment for tuberculosis.