Wml. Neethling et al., LABORATORY EVALUATION OF TISSUE HEART-VALVES - A COMPARATIVE-ASSESSMENT, Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery, 37(4), 1996, pp. 377-383
Tissue of commercially prepared tissue heart valves were evaluated and
compared with aluminium treated, fixed porcine valve tissue in vitro
(tensile strength, scanning and transmission electron microscopy) and
in vivo (calcification potential after subcutaneous implantation in th
e rat model), Valve leaflets (n=40) were devided into four groups acco
rding to the method of treatment: Group I (fixed in 0.652% glutaraldeh
yde, control), Group II (fixed and treated with aluminium), Group III
(fixed and treated with Toluidine blue) and Group IV (fixed and treate
d with watersoluble alkyl sulphate), Tensile strength was not influenc
ed in Group II and III (p>0.05). Group IV indicated a significant (p<0
.05) reduction in tensile strength. Scanning electron microscopy revea
led damage and loss of surface endothelium in Group III and IV respect
ively. Transmission electron microscopy indicated damage to underlying
matricial cells in Group III and IV. Calcification potential was sign
ificantly (p<0.001) reduced in Group II to IV. We conclude that damage
d ultrastructure could contribute to the reduced tensile strength in G
roup IV and that reduced tensile strength might have an influence on t
he long-term durability of tissue heart valves. Antimineralization tre
atment of tissue heart valves does retard calcification but is yet una
ble to inhibit the process completely.