Rwh. Butler et S. Freeman, CAN CRUSTAL EXTENSION BE DISTINGUISHED FROM THRUSTING IN THE INTERNALPARTS OF MOUNTAIN BELTS - A CASE-HISTORY OF THE ENTRELOR SHEAR ZONE, WESTERN ALPS, Journal of structural geology, 18(7), 1996, pp. 909-923
Criteria for the distinguishing between structures that accommodate cr
ustal-scale extension or crustal-scale shortening may be applied to la
te orogenic shear zones developed in the internal parts of mountain be
lts. This is done for a large shear zone that has been mapped in the N
W Italian Alps, around the internal basement massif of Gran Paradiso.
The structure involved is termed the Entrelor shear zone. It carries g
reenschist facies European continental rocks (the Brianconnais-Grand S
t. Bernard unit) onto an old subduction complex of oceanic (Piemonte)
and continental (Gran Paradiso) material that preserve eclogitic assem
blages. Evidence for the map-scale continuity of the Entrelor shear zo
ne is presented together with kinematic data to show how folds, stretc
hing lineations and shear criteria relate to a regional episode of ESE
-directed shearing. However, folds initiated systematically oblique to
the shear direction, on a NE-SW axis. With continued shearing, the fo
ld population remains skewed E-W of the population of stretching linea
tions. The shear zone may be traced for 70 km around the dome of the G
ran Paradise massif and displays a minimum displacement of 20 km. This
Entrelor structure shows variable offset of metamorphic grade. Howeve
r, for much of its length, greenschist facies rocks are carried in its
hanging-wall onto eclogites in the footwall. Tracing these units regi
onally shows that this apparent extensional offset of metamorphic faci
es is the result of restacking of an originally 'inverted' metamorphic
sequence (i.e. HP Piemonte on LP Brianconnais). This contractional be
havior is consistent with the profile of the shear zone relative to th
e modern surface. The Entrelor shear climbs up from generally buried i
n the west to generally eroded in the east. The conclusion that the En
trelor shear zone is probably a thrust rather than an extensional stru
cture relies on linking outcrop data into a semi-regional context. Fal
se interpretations may result from examining only small parts of the s
tructure. However, although these map and structural criteria are cons
istent with contractional kinematics associated with crustal shortenin
g, confirmation is required through linked petrological and isotopic s
tudies. The Entrelor shear zone is thus a good illustration of the nee
d for caution in inferring the contractional or extensional nature of
structures developed late in the history of the internal parts of moun
tain belts. Copyright (C) 1996 Elsevier Science Ltd.