AUTOLOGOUS BLOOD-TRANSFUSION IN THE FEDER AL-REPUBLIC-OF-GERMANY - RESULTS OF A 1993 QUESTIONNAIRE .2. THE USE OF AUTOLOGOUS BLOOD-TRANSFUSION IN THE OLD AND NEW STATES OF THE FEDERAL-REPUBLIC-OF-GERMANY AFTERREUNIFICATION
Sm. Kasper et al., AUTOLOGOUS BLOOD-TRANSFUSION IN THE FEDER AL-REPUBLIC-OF-GERMANY - RESULTS OF A 1993 QUESTIONNAIRE .2. THE USE OF AUTOLOGOUS BLOOD-TRANSFUSION IN THE OLD AND NEW STATES OF THE FEDERAL-REPUBLIC-OF-GERMANY AFTERREUNIFICATION, Anasthesist, 45(7), 1996, pp. 606-613
In 1993, we conducted a postal survey to assess the use of autologous
blood transfusion (ABT) in the Federal Republic of Germany after reuni
fication. The results of this survey have already been reported in a p
revious paper, but without differentiation between the ''old'' and ''n
ew'' states (former West Germany and former German Democratic Republic
, respectively). In the present study, the data of our 1993 survey wer
e further analysed to see if there were differences in the use of ABT
between the ''old'' and ''new'' states. Methods. The study is based on
data of a 1993 postal survey of German hospitals. Details concerning
the performance of the survey have been reported in a previous paper.
Briefly, questionnaires were mailed to the anaesthesia departments of
400 randomly selected hospitals in the ''old'' states and 284 hospital
s in the ''new'' states of the Federal Republic of Germany. The questi
onnaires contained 36 questions related to general information on the
hospital and the use of ABT; 305 completed questionnaires were returne
d from the ''old'' states and 197 from the ''new'' states, response ra
tes of 76% and 69%, respectively. For the present investigation, the:
responses of the hospitals of the ''old'' and ''new'' states were anal
ysed separately. Frequency distributions of categorical variables were
analysed by the chi-square test. Because of multiple testing, statist
ical significance was attained only at the 0.05% level (P less than or
equal to 0.0005). Results. There were no significant differences betw
een the ''old'' and ''new'' states with respect to hospital size by nu
mber of beds, percentage of general and specialised hospitals, and per
centage of operations requiring blood transfusion. In both the ''old''
and ''new'' states, 9% of the responding hospitals maintained a hospi
tal-based transfusion service, while the other depended on regional bl
ood banks. Preoperative autologous blood donation (PABD) was performed
at least ''rarely'' in 85% and 71% (P = 0.0001), and ''mostly'' in 20
% and 10% (P = 0.0014) of the hospitals in the ''old'' and ''new'' sta
tes, respectively. Uniformly, the principal uses of PABD were for orth
opaedic and cardiac surgery. In 62% and 27% (P < 0.0001) of those hosp
itals that reported performing PABD, the autologous blood service was
run by the anaesthesia department. Preoperative plasmapheresis was per
formed in 14% and 8% (P = 0.008), and isovolaemic haemodilution in 82%
and 56% (P < 0.0001) of the hospitals in the ''old'' and ''new'' stat
es, respectively. Automated autotransfusion devices (cell savers) were
available in 38% and 19% (P < 0.0001) of the hospitals, respectively.
Simple collection devices for perioperative blood salvage were used i
n 17% and 15% (P = 0.24) of the hospitals in the ''old'' and ''new'' s
tates, respectively. Conclusion. We conclude that ABT is more widely u
sed in the ''old'' than the ''new'' states of the Federal Republic of
Germany. ABT is regarded as a desirable alternative to homologous bloo
d transfusion, and in the interest of equal standards of medical care
throughout the nation, the use of ABT should be further promoted, espe
cially in the ''new'' states of the Federal Republic of Germany.