Background/Aims: Although periampullary carcinoma can often be diagnos
ed at an early stage because of its strategic location, in a substanti
al number of cases (23% to 25% of periampullary carcinoma cases), the
papilla can be prominent, but without an identifiable mass or ulcerati
on. As a result, duocdenoscopy alone can miss the tumor. In this serie
s, the usefulness of sphincterotomy in establishing a diagnosis of per
iampullary carcinoma is documented. Materials and Methods: A total of
664 patients, who had clinical, biochemical and/or sonographic evidenc
e of pancreaticobiliary disorders underwent endoscopic retrograde chol
angiopancreaticography (ERCP) at Hacettepe University Hospital between
March 1985 and September 1994. All identified lesions were biopsied.
Results: In sixty-six of the 664 patients, a specific periampullary or
pancreatic diagnosis could be made. These included 30 cases of pancre
atic carcinoma (14 in the head, 15 in the corpus, and 1 in the tail),
10 cases of chronic pancreatitis, 15 cases of periampullary carcinoma
and 11 miscellaneous. None of the 15 periampullary carcinomas was demo
nstrable by abdominal computed tomography, sonography or pancreatic an
giography. In 22, the diagnosis was established immediately by endosco
pic visualization of the tumor and biopsy. In the remaining 3, the tum
or was visualized as a protruding mass only after a papillatomy was pe
rformed. All cases were treated surgically with a pylorus preserving p
ancreaticoduodenectomy. No symptoms of dumping were experienced postop
eratively. The survival of these 15 patients was good with a mean surv
ival of 24.2 months. Conclusions: Careful endoscopic examination of th
e periampullary mucosa before and after sphincterotomy is required to
identify periampullary carcinoma. A pylorus preserving pancreaticoduod
enectomy revealed excellent post-surgical outcome with no post operati
ve symptoms of the dumping syndrome.