SYSTEMATICS OF THE FRESH-WATER CRAYFISH GENUS CHERAX ERICHSON (DECAPODA, PARASTACIDAE) IN SOUTH-WESTERN AUSTRALIA - ELECTROPHORETIC, MORPHOLOGICAL AND HABITAT VARIATION
Cm. Austin et B. Knott, SYSTEMATICS OF THE FRESH-WATER CRAYFISH GENUS CHERAX ERICHSON (DECAPODA, PARASTACIDAE) IN SOUTH-WESTERN AUSTRALIA - ELECTROPHORETIC, MORPHOLOGICAL AND HABITAT VARIATION, Australian journal of zoology, 44(3), 1996, pp. 223-258
A detailed study of electrophoretic, morphological and habitat variati
on amongst species of Cherax in south-western Australia supported the
recognition of only five of the eight species currently recognised and
revealed that morphological and habitat variation within these crayfi
sh is more extensive and complicated than was previously realised. Wit
hin several species morphological and habitat variation was found to b
e as great as that between species. Furthermore, a major component of
the morphological variability, both within and between species, was fo
und to be associated with habitat variation. Three of the five species
of Cherax recognised in this study correspond to the consistently rec
ognised and widespread species, C. preissii Erichson, C. quinquecarina
tus (Gray) and C. tenuimanus Smith. The two other species are C. crass
imantus Riek and C. glaber Riek which have restricted distributions in
the extreme south-west of Western Australia. The species C. glabriman
us Riek and C. neocarinatus Riek could not be distinguished from C. qu
inquecarinatus, nor could C. plebejus (Hess) be distinguished from C.
preissii. On a general level, the results of this study question the v
alue of morphological information in systematic studies of freshwater
crayfish. Morphologically based taxonomic studies of freshwater crayfi
sh need to be interpreted with caution because, firstly, taxonomic cha
racters may be far more variable than realised; secondly, morphologica
l and habitat differences cannot necessarily be equated with specific
distinctions; and thirdly, genetically distinct species that occupy si
milar habitats need not be morphologically distinct.