A number of standards used for K-Ar and Ar-40/Ar-39 dating have been i
ntercalibrated. Multiple splits (similar to 15-40 mg each) of MMhb-1,
SB-3 Biotite, LP-6 Biotite 40-60#, GA1550 Biotite, Fish Canyon Tuff-3
Biotite, Taylor Creek Rhyolite Sanidine, Fern 4 Muscovite, Bern 4 Biot
ite and Pennsylvania State University Orthoclase-1A were irradiated in
capsules, fused and analyzed. In replicate analyses, most of these st
andards proved to be homogeneous in Ar-40/Ar-39(K) ratio (age) K, Ca,
and Ar-36 contents. MMhb-1 is inhomogeneous in age at the similar to
15-mg level, indicating it is unsuitable for use as an interlaboratory
standard using material taken straight from the bottle; the orthoclas
e sample is also inhomogeneous at the similar to 30-mg level. Quoted r
elative ro an age of 162.9 Ma for the SB-3 Biotite standard, total fus
ion ages are: LP-6 Biotite 40-60# = 128.1 Ma; GA1550 Biotite = 97.8 Ma
; Fish Canyon Tuff-3 Biotite = 27.95 Ma; Taylor Creek Rhyolite Sanidin
e = 28.0 Ma; Bern 4 Muscovite = 18.51 Ma; Bern 4 Biotite = 17.21 Ma. T
hese ages are in good agreement with the (absolute) K-Ar ages of these
minerals. Different preparations of biotite and sanidine standards fr
om a welded tuff such as the Fish Canyon Tuff may not be of identical
ages. Tests on submilligram splits reveals that SB-3 Biotite, GA1550 B
iotite, Fish Canyon Tuff-3 Biotite and Taylor Creek Rhyolite Sanidine
are suitable for use as monitors in laser work; the sanidine specimen
appears to be the most suitable for use as the primary monitor for Ar-
40/Ar-39 dating.