One reason for the inconsistent findings in schizophrenia research is
the lack of diagnostic conformity In the face of modern operational ''
atheoretical'' diagnostic systems, this dilemma is still present. In o
rder to examine specificity and validity of diagnoses, we carried out
a systematic twin study with index twins suffering from schizophrenic
spectrum psychoses. We compared the diagnostic systems of DSM-III-R, w
hich is based on consensus of international experts, with Leonhards' n
osology developed on sophisticated clinical observation and descriptio
n of psychopathological phenomena occurring during the long-term cours
e of psychiatric diseases. We examined twin concordance, family histor
y, and the frequency and severity of complications of pregnancy and ch
ildbirth. The results suggest that the schizophrenic spectrum has to b
e divided into clinically and etiologically heterogeneous subgroups. T
his was much more striking when Leonhard's diagnostic criteria were us
ed than with DSM-III-R diagnostic criteria. There seem to be three val
id and etiologically different groups: cycloid psychoses, unsystematic
schizophrenias and systematic schizophrenias as proposed by Leonhard.
In cycloid psychoses genetic loading seems to be low (proband concord
ance MZ 38 %, DZ 29 %), but pregnancy and birth complications may have
an important role in the etiology. On the other hand, unsystematic sc
hizophrenias are obviously predominantly inherited (proband concordanc
e MZ 88 %, DZ 17 %) and ''environmental'' factors are not very promine
nt. It is striking that MZ twins with a diagnosis of systematic schizo
phrenia have not yet been found, whereas 32 % of DZ index twins (6 out
of 19) were diagnosed as having systematic schizophrenia. Further, al
l DZ twins with the diagnosis of systematic schizophrenia were discord
ant and the affected twins had threetimes as many and as severe pregna
ncy and birth complications in the history than their healthy co-twins
.