P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is a crucial factor in the development of chemot
herapy resistance in malignant disorders. Between 1989 and 1995, P-gp
expression was studied in bone marrow blast cells of 322 (239 AML; 83
ALL) acute leukemia patients. 166 AML patients with the AML-6 protocol
(EORTC), containing daunorubicin, vincristine and conventional-dose c
ytarabine (ara-C), and 63 AML patients treated with intermediate-dose
Ara-C plus amsacrine. Further 71 ALL patients were treated according t
o a German standard polychemotherapy protocol (BMFT04/1989). P-gp was
determined by using monoclonal antibodies C219 and 4E3, and the cutoff
point for P-gp overexpression was set at greater than or equal to 10%
. A significant (P < 0.05) difference in P-gp overexpression was demon
strated between AML (21.6%) and ALL (10.2%) patients at primary diagno
sis and between primary diagnosis and relapse/refractoriness in AML (2
1.6%; 51.0%) and ALL (10.2%; 27.2%) patients. According to FAB classif
ication P-gp overexpression was detected in AML patients significantly
(P < 0.05) more frequently in classes M4, M5a and M5b and less freque
ntly in M3, as compared to other types. For AML patients with P-gp ove
rexpression at primary diagnosis or early relapse/refractoriness, the
predictive value for nonresponse to the AML-6 protocol was 91 and 95%,
respectively, while late-relapsed AML patients with P-gp overexpressi
on had a significantly (P < 0.05) lower predictive value of 73% for no
nresponse. Additionally, in refractory and late-relapsed P-gp-overexpr
essing AML patients treated with intermediate-dose ara-C plus amsacrin
e the predictive values for nonresponse were 44 and 39%, respectively,
significantly (P < 0.05) lower as compared to AML-6 protocol-treated
refractory or late-relapsed AML patients. In P-gp-overexpressing treat
ed ALL patients the predictive values of 50 and 55% for nonresponse we
re calculated at primary diagnosis and late relapse, respectively. We
conclude that P-gp overexpression is a common phenomenon in AML patien
ts at primary diagnosis or relapse, has an inverse influence on AML-6
treatment outcome and should be taken into consideration in the develo
pment of new therapy strategies.