INDUCED PHOSPHORUS FIXATION AND THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PHOSPHATE FERTILIZERS DERIVED FROM SUKULU HILLS PHOSPHATE ROCK

Citation
Cn. Butegwa et al., INDUCED PHOSPHORUS FIXATION AND THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PHOSPHATE FERTILIZERS DERIVED FROM SUKULU HILLS PHOSPHATE ROCK, Fertilizer research, 44(3), 1996, pp. 231-240
Citations number
37
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture Soil Science
Journal title
ISSN journal
01671731
Volume
44
Issue
3
Year of publication
1996
Pages
231 - 240
Database
ISI
SICI code
0167-1731(1996)44:3<231:IPFATE>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
A greenhouse study was conducted with two surface, acidic soils (a Hiw assee loam and a Marvyn loamy sand) to measure the effect of increasin g P-fixation capacity, on the relative agronomic effectiveness (RAE) o f phosphate fertilizers derived from Sukulu Hills phosphate rock (PR) from Uganda. Prior to fertilizer application, Fe-gel was added to incr ease P-fixation capacity from 4.4 to 14.3% for the Marvyn soil and fro m 37.0 to 61.5% for the Hiwassee soil. Phosphate materials included co mpacted Sukulu Hills concentrate PR + Triple superphosphate (CTSP) at a total P ratio of PR:TSP = 50:50; 50% partially acidulated PR (CPAPR) from Sukulu Hills concentrate PR made with H2SO4; and Sukulu Hills co ncentrate PR (PRC) made by magnetically removing iron oxide from raw P R ore. Triple superphosphate (TSP) was used as a reference fertilizer. After adjusting soil pH to approximately 6, P sources were applied at rates of 0, 50, 150, and 300 mg total P kg(-1) soil. Two successive c rops of 5 week old corn seedlings (Zea mays L.) were grown. The result s show that the RAE of the phosphate materials measured using dry-matt er yield or P uptake generally decreased as P-fixation capacity was in creased for both soils. CTSP was more effective in increasing dry-matt er yield and P uptake than CPAPR. PRC alone was an ineffective P sourc e. Soil chemical analysis showed that Pray 1 and Mehlich 1 extractants were ineffective on the high P-fixation capacity Fe-gel amended Hiwas see soil. Mehlich 1 was unsuitable for soils treated with PRC since it apparently solubilizes unreactive PR. When all of the soils and P sou rces were considered together, Pi paper was the most reliable test for estimating plant available P.