A REEVALUATION OF THE CRYSTAL-STRUCTURE OF CHLOROMUCONATE CYCLOISOMERASE

Citation
Gj. Kleywegt et al., A REEVALUATION OF THE CRYSTAL-STRUCTURE OF CHLOROMUCONATE CYCLOISOMERASE, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography, 52, 1996, pp. 858-863
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Crystallography,"Biochemical Research Methods",Biology
ISSN journal
09074449
Volume
52
Year of publication
1996
Part
4
Pages
858 - 863
Database
ISI
SICI code
0907-4449(1996)52:<858:AROTCO>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
It is shown here that the reported 3 Angstrom crystal structure of chl oromuconate cycloisomerase from Alcaligenes eutrophus [Hoier, Schloman n, Hammer, Glusker, Carrell, Goldman, Stezowski & Heinemann (1994). Ac ta Cryst. D50, 75-84] was refined in the incorrect space group I4. In addition, a stretch of about 25 residues near the N-terminus is out-of -register with the density in the original structure. From the coordin ates and structure factors deposited in the Protein Data Bank (PDB), i t was possible to determine the correct space group to be I422. The st ructure was then re-refined, using the original data reduced to I422, to a crystallographic free R factor of 0.264 at 3 Angstrom resolution (conventional R factor 0.189). With conservative refinement and rebuil ding methods, the errors in the chain tracing could be identified and remedied. Since the two molecules per asymmetric unit in the original structure are actually related by crystallographic symmetry, the obser ved differences between them are artefacts. In particular, the differe nces between, and peculiarities of the metal-binding sites are unreal. This case shows the dangers of crystallographic refinement in cases w ith unfavourable data-to-parameter ratios, and the importance of reduc ing the number of parameters in such cases to prevent gross errors (fo r instance, by using NCS constraints). It also demonstrates how the ev aluation and monitoring of model quality during the entire refinement and rebuilding process can be used to detect and remedy serious errors . Finally, it presents a strong case in favour of depositing not only model coordinates, but also experimental data (preferably, both merged and unmerged data).