This research addresses the relationship between conservative Protesta
ntism and the perceived wrongfulness of crimes. In a recent study, War
r (1989) identified ''nondiscriminators''-people who perceived a wide
range of crimes to be equally morally wrong. Although lacking measures
of religion, Warr hypothesized, based on their written comments, that
the respondents used religious beliefs to assess wrongfulness. Since
Protestant theology tends to view morality categorically, with no grad
ations between the extremes, those individuals who most strongly adher
e to this doctrine may be the nondiscriminators. This study tests and
finds strong support for this hypothesis, which has important implicat
ions for the recent shift toward increased punitiveness in sentencing,
research concerning public perceptions of crime, and studies of relig
ion.