MADD MASSACHUSETTS VERSUS SENATOR BURKE - A MEDIA ADVOCACY CASE-STUDY

Authors
Citation
W. Dejong, MADD MASSACHUSETTS VERSUS SENATOR BURKE - A MEDIA ADVOCACY CASE-STUDY, Health education quarterly, 23(3), 1996, pp. 318-329
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath
Journal title
ISSN journal
01958402
Volume
23
Issue
3
Year of publication
1996
Pages
318 - 329
Database
ISI
SICI code
0195-8402(1996)23:3<318:MMVSB->2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
In 1991, the Massachusetts legislature considered a bill that would ha ve allowed a drunk driving defendant's refusal to take a breathalyzer test to be admitted as evidence in a criminal trial. After the measure passed in both houses, a stair senator used a parliamentary maneuver to prevent it from being prepared for the governor's signature. Mother s Against Drunk Driving (MADD) employed media advocacy techniques to a lert the public, but the senator was unyielding and the legislative ca lendar ran out with the bill unsigned. Because of MADD's efforts, howe ver, the senate president put the bill on a ''fast track'' the followi ng year. The news media's focused attention on MADD's protests exposed deep schisms among its volunteer leadership regarding the nature and purpose of the organization and the appropriateness of using confronta tional media strategies to advance its agenda. Paralyzed by the lack o f consensus, MADD Massachusetts was rendered a far less effective advo cate for policy change.