Pj. Schwartz et al., WINTER SEASONAL AFFECTIVE-DISORDER - A FOLLOW-UP-STUDY OF THE FIRST 59 PATIENTS OF THE NATIONAL-INSTITUTE-OF-MENTAL-HEALTH SEASONAL STUDIESPROGRAM, The American journal of psychiatry, 153(8), 1996, pp. 1028-1036
Objective: The purpose of this study was to characterize the long-term
course of patients with seasonal affective disorder. Method: The firs
t 59 patients with winter seasonal affective disorder who had entered
winter protocols were retrospectively followed up after a mean interva
l of 8.8 years. Detailed life charts were constructed through use of a
semistructured interview and collateral records. Results: The disorde
r of 25 patients (42%) remained purely seasonal, with regular recurren
ces of winter depression and no depression or treatment through any su
mmer. The course of illness was complicated by varying degrees of nons
easonal depression in 26 patients (44%). The disorders of eight patien
ts (14%) had fully remitted. Certain features of the group with compli
cated seasonal affective disorder suggested that they were more severe
ly ill. Twenty-four patients (41%) continued to use light treatment re
gularly throughout the follow-up period. Light treatment was preferred
to medication for winter recurrences, although antidepressants had be
en used in the winter by most (63%) of the patients who still used lig
hts at follow-up. Conclusions: The pattern of winter depressions and s
ummer remissions remained fairly persistent over time in this group of
patients. The temporal distribution of depressive episodes both withi
n and across individual patients was consistent with the results of se
veral recent follow-up studies of seasonal affective disorder, providi
ng support for the predictive and construct validity of the Rosenthal
et al. diagnosis of winter seasonal affective disorder. Light treatmen
t, while remaining a safe and satisfactory treatment for many, may be
insufficient for more severely ill patients. The appearance of nonseas
onal depressions in patients with winter seasonal affective disorder m
ay be associated with greater severity of illness and less responsiven
ess to light treatment.