THE EMPIRICAL IDENTIFICATION OF INSOMNIA SUBTYPES, A CLUSTER ANALYTICAPPROACH

Citation
Jd. Edinger et al., THE EMPIRICAL IDENTIFICATION OF INSOMNIA SUBTYPES, A CLUSTER ANALYTICAPPROACH, Sleep, 19(5), 1996, pp. 398-411
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Behavioral Sciences","Clinical Neurology
Journal title
SleepACNP
ISSN journal
01618105
Volume
19
Issue
5
Year of publication
1996
Pages
398 - 411
Database
ISI
SICI code
0161-8105(1996)19:5<398:TEIOIS>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
Over the past 15 years, there has been considerable debate concerning the extent to which insomnia patients can be classified into diagnosti c subtypes. Despite this debate, relatively little research has been c onducted to empirically determine whether naturally occurring insomnia subtypes might be identified within populations of sleep clinic patie nts. In the current study we used a hierarchical cluster analysis to e mpirically identify subtypes among a mixed group of normal sleepers an d the insomnia outpatients who presented to our sleep center over the past decade. Using factor-analytically derived composite variables tha t summarized data obtained from sleep history questionnaires and polys omnographic monitoring, this clustering procedure resulted in the iden tification of 14 subgroups that varied between four and 34 patients/su bjects in size. Subsequently, subgroup mean scores for the composite v ariables used in the clustering procedure were used to construct profi les for each of the 14 clusters. A multivariate profile analysis, empl oyed to elucidate subgroup differences, showed that these cluster prof iles differed in terms of their configural shapes, average elevations, and degrees of interscale differences. Furthermore, both DSM-III-R (A merican Psychiatric Association) and International Classification of S leep Disorders (ICSD) insomnia diagnoses, assigned independent of clus ter Endings, suggested that these subtypes differed significantly in r egard to their diagnostic compositions. Nevertheless, a far-from-perfe ct concordance was observed between such clinically assigned diagnoses and cluster group membership. In fact, many of the empirically identi fied groups were composed of various DSM-III-R and/or ICSD diagnostic subtypes. These results provided only partial support for current DSM and ICSD insomnia categories. However, our results support the existen ce of multiple, clinically discrete insomnia subtypes and provide info rmation that may be useful in future revisions of current insomnia nos ologies.