This article claims The Bell Curve merely reiterates the fallacious ar
gument long embraced by psychometricians: that intelligence can be red
uced to a single ordinal measure (g) that is the primary factor for de
termining group or individual social-class status. The book's policy r
ecommendations, particularly its call to dismantle initiatives designe
d to ameliorate social inequality, are shown to have evolved from pseu
doscientific theories about the distribution of cognitive abilities ac
ross racial/ethnic groups. Evidence from the biological sciences and q
uantitative genetics is presented, pointing to the significance of env
ironmental and physiological factors neglected by the psychometric pro
gram. These data reveal that social inequality is not a symptom of imm
utable biological inequalities but rather the result of longstanding b
iases and differential opportunity structures.