This article argues that divergent images of community result not from
inadequate knowledge or confusion of purpose, but from the location o
f discourse and action in the context of specific struggles and dilemm
as. It supports the view that 'struggles over resources' are also 'str
uggles over meaning'. It demonstrates the ways in which contests over
the distribution of property are articulated in terms of competing rep
resentations of community at a range of levels and sites. It suggests
that, through the exercise of 'practical political economy', particula
r representations of community can be used strategically to strengthen
the property claims of potentially disadvantaged groups. In the polic
y arena, advocates for 'community based resource management' have repr
esented communities as sites of consensus and sustainability. Though i
dealized, such representations have provided a vocabulary with which t
o defend the rights of communities vis-a-vis states. Poor farmers, dev
elopment planners, consultants and academics can also use representati
ons of community strategically to achieve positive effects, or at leas
t to mitigate negative ones. Most, but not all, of the illustrations i
n this article are drawn from Indonesia, with special reference to Cen
tral Sulawesi.