RELATIVE MEASURES OF GEOGRAPHIC RANGE SIZE - EMPIRICAL COMPARISONS

Citation
Rm. Quinn et al., RELATIVE MEASURES OF GEOGRAPHIC RANGE SIZE - EMPIRICAL COMPARISONS, Oecologia, 107(2), 1996, pp. 179-188
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Ecology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00298549
Volume
107
Issue
2
Year of publication
1996
Pages
179 - 188
Database
ISI
SICI code
0029-8549(1996)107:2<179:RMOGRS>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
Many different measures of range size are used for both empirical and conservation purposes. The possible consequences of the particular met hods used in determining observed patterns of results are seldom consi dered. Using species of butterflies and freshwater molluscs in Britain , we investigate the relationship between the range sizes measured by nine different methods and the sets of rare species they distinguish. A comparison of range sizes measured at different scales, Britain and Europe, is also made for the butterflies. We find that for many studie s involving range size the various measures of range size are intercha ngeable. With respect to the identification of rare species the result s are not as clear.