E. Eeckhout et al., COMPARISON OF ELECTIVE WIKTOR STENT PLACEMENT WITH CONVENTIONAL BALLOON ANGIOPLASTY FOR NEW-ONSET LESIONS OF THE RIGHT CORONARY-ARTERY, The American heart journal, 132(2), 1996, pp. 263-268
This study compared the clinical and angiographic outcome, during a 6-
month follow-up period, of 84 patients with new-onset lesions of the r
ight coronary artery randomized to either Wiktor stent implantation (4
2 patients) or conventional balloon angioplasty (42 patients). At hosp
ital discharge, three patients in each group (7%, p = not significant
[NS]) reached a clinical end point. At 6 months, these proportions wer
e 24% (10 patients with stents) and 29% (12 patients with angioplasty)
(p = NS). There were no incidents of death or myocardial infarction.
Despite a larger minimal luminal diameter after stenting (2.87 mm [95%
confidence interval; 2.66 to 2.96 mm] vs 2.37 mm [2.23 to 2.61 mm for
angioplasty] [p = 0.001]), no difference was observed at 6 months of
follow-up (1.75 mm [1.43 to 2.18 mm] vs 1.74 mm [1.45 to 2.03 mm] [p =
NS], respectively). Accordingly, angiographic restenosis rates were 4
7.5% (19 of 40 patients with stents) and 35% (14 of 40 patients with a
ngioplasty) (p = NS). Elective stenting with the Wiktor stent and conv
entional balloon angioplasty are safe and immediately effective therap
eutic options for symptomatic, obstructive right coronary artery disea
se. At 6 months of follow-up, clinical and angiographic outcome did no
t differ. The role of Wiktor stent placement in primary restenosis pre
vention remains to be determined for lesions of the right coronary art
ery.