DOPPLER TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC DETERMINATION OF AORTIC-VALVE AREA IN ADULTS WITH AORTIC-STENOSIS

Citation
Mf. Stoddard et al., DOPPLER TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC DETERMINATION OF AORTIC-VALVE AREA IN ADULTS WITH AORTIC-STENOSIS, The American heart journal, 132(2), 1996, pp. 337-342
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiac & Cardiovascular System
Journal title
ISSN journal
00028703
Volume
132
Issue
2
Year of publication
1996
Part
1
Pages
337 - 342
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-8703(1996)132:2<337:DTEDOA>2.0.ZU;2-1
Abstract
Two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography has been shown to be an accurate method of measuring aortic valve area in patients with aor tic stenosis. The accuracy of Doppler transesophageal echocardiography for this purpose is unknown. Thus 86 consecutive adult patients (mean age 68 +/- 11 years) with calcific (n = 79) or congenital bicuspid (n = 7) AS were studied by biplane or multiplane transesophageal echocar diography. From the transgastric long-axis view, continuous wave Doppl er of peak aortic valve velocity and pulsed Doppler of left ventricula r outflow tract velocity were determined. Left ventricular outflow tra ct diameter was measured from a transesophageal echocardiography long- axis view, and cross-sectional area was calculated. Aortic valve area was calculated by the continuity equation. Two-dimensional transesopha geal echocardiography was used to directly measure aortic valve area b y planimetry of the minimal orifice from a short-axis view. Aortic val ve area determination was less feasible by Doppler (62 of 86 patients, or 72%) versus two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (81 o f 86 patients, or 94%; p < 0.0025) because of the inability to align t he continuous wave Doppler beam with the aorta in 24 patients. The fea sibility of obtaining aortic valve area by Doppler transesophageal ech ocardiography improved from the first 43 patients (24 of 43 patients, or 56%) to the latter 43 patients (38 of 43 patients, or 88%; p < 0.00 25) and suggests a significant learning curve. In 62 patients, aortic valve area by Doppler and two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiogr aphy did not differ (1.30 +/- 0.54 cm(2) vs 1.23 +/- 0.46 cm(2), p = n ot significant) and correlated well (r = 0.88; standard error of the e stimate = 0.26 cm(2); intercept = 0.02 cm(2); slope = 1.04; p = 0.0001 ). Absolute and percent differences between aortic valve area measured by Doppler and two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography were small (0.18 +/- 0.20 cm(2) and 15% +/- 15%, respectively). Mild, moder ate, and severe aortic stenosis by two-dimensional transesophageal ech ocardiography was correctly identified in 93% (28 of 30), 79% (15 of 1 9), and 77% (10 of 13) of patients by Doppler transesophageal echocard iography, respectively. Doppler transesophageal echocardiography is an accurate method to measure aortic valve area in patients with aortic stenosis and should complement two-dimensional transesophageal echocar diography. The feasibility of Doppler transesophageal echocardiography for aortic valve area determination has a significant learning curve