BASIC CULTURAL-VALUES AND DIFFERENCES IN ATTITUDES TOWARDS HEALTH, ILLNESS AND TREATMENT PREFERENCES WITHIN A PSYCHOSOMATIC FRAME OF REFERENCE

Citation
Fj. Bekker et al., BASIC CULTURAL-VALUES AND DIFFERENCES IN ATTITUDES TOWARDS HEALTH, ILLNESS AND TREATMENT PREFERENCES WITHIN A PSYCHOSOMATIC FRAME OF REFERENCE, Psychotherapy and psychosomatics, 65(4), 1996, pp. 191-198
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Psychiatry,Psychiatry,Psychology
ISSN journal
00333190
Volume
65
Issue
4
Year of publication
1996
Pages
191 - 198
Database
ISI
SICI code
0033-3190(1996)65:4<191:BCADIA>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
Background: Regarded from a biopsychosocial point of view, a culturall y determined differential impact of values, lifestyles and attitudes c an be expected on health and illness concepts, exerting a potential in fluence on the general satisfaction with the health care system as wel l as on subjective treatment preferences. Methods: 57 men and 63 women between 16 and 86 years of age in the Netherlands and 45 men and 39 w omen aged between 15 and 78 years in Japan took part in the study. Que stions to the subjects were not exclusively restricted to medical care but comprised the potential relationship between health and illness o n the one hand, and lifestyles, values, attitudes and treatment prefer ences on the other. On the basis of previous experience with data from the Dutch sample 27 questions were selected and, using the whole samp le, submitted to a factor analysis. Furthermore subjective health and illness attributions were compared by means of a projective technique. Results: The factor analysis resulted in five dimensions: relaxation, work, hedonistic goals versus social status, family life versus caree r making, alternative versus conventional medical care, with three sig nificant differences between the two countries and two significant gen der effects. The projective technique revealed two cultural difference s in illness attributions. Conclusions: The implications of these resu lts for possible health promotion campaigns and a differential choice of health-care strategies are discussed from within a psychosomatic fr ame of reference. It is hypothesized that the revealed differences can also be useful for attempts at a group-specific increase of acceptanc e and compliance of certain treatments.