In a series of 4 studies, we explored preschoolers' understanding of t
hought bubbles. Very few 3-year-olds or 4-year-olds we tested knew wha
t a thought-bubble depiction was without instruction. But, if simply t
old that the thought bubble ''shows what someone is thinking,'' the va
st majority of 3-year-olds and 4-year-olds easily understood the devic
es as depicting thoughts generally and individual thought contents spe
cifically. In total, these children used thought-bubble depictions to
ascertain the contents of characters' thoughts in a variety of situati
ons; appropriately distinguished such depictions from mere associated
actions or objects; described thought bubbles in the language of menta
l states; judged that persons' thoughts in these depictions were-subje
ctive in the sense of person-specific (and hence 2 people can have dif
ferent thoughts about tile same state of affairs); and judged that tho
ught-bubble thoughts (a) were representational in the sense of depicti
ng or showing some other state of affairs, (b) were mental and thus sh
owed intangible, private, internal thoughts unlike real pictures or ph
otographs, and (ci can be false, that is, can depict a person's misrep
resentation of some state of affairs. We discuss the implications of t
hese findings for young children's understanding of thoughts and thoug
ht bubbles, for their learning and comprehension of pictorial conventi
ons, and for the use of thought bubbles to assess children's early und
erstanding of mind.