Id. Waldman, AGGRESSIVE BOYS HOSTILE PERCEPTUAL AND RESPONSE BIASES - THE ROLE OF ATTENTION AND IMPULSIVITY, Child development, 67(3), 1996, pp. 1015-1033
The present study addressed whether (1) aggressive boys show hostile b
iases or general deficits in social perception, (2) aggressive boys' s
ocial perceptual difficulties also characterize isolate and isolate-ag
gressive children, (3) aggressive, isolate, and isolate-aggressive boy
s' social perceptual difficulties are attributable to inattention and
impulsivity, and (4) aggressive and nonaggressive boys differ in the l
inks between social perception and proposed behavioral responses. Aggr
essive boys demonstrated hostile biases, but not general deficits, in
intention-cue detection relative to average-status boys. Isolate-aggre
ssive boys resembled aggressive boys in social perception, whereas iso
late boys showed mild deficits relative to average-status boys. Althou
gh isolates' general deficits were predominantly accounted for by inat
tention and impulsivity, aggressives' and isolate-aggressives' hostile
biases remained after these problems were statistically controlled. T
he aggressive groups proposed aggressive responses much more frequentl
y than the nonaggressive groups following intentions perceived as nonh
ostile. Measures corresponding to several stages of Dodge's social inf
ormation processing model discriminated the aggressive from nonaggress
ive groups, thus providing support for this model.