G. Chick et Rd. Hood, WORKING AND RECREATING WITH MACHINES - OUTDOOR RECREATION CHOICES AMONG MACHINE-TOOL WORKERS IN WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA, Leisure sciences, 18(4), 1996, pp. 333-354
Citations number
93
Categorie Soggetti
Environmental Studies",Sociology,"Art & Humanities General","Mathematics, General
The relationship between work and leisure has most often been describe
d in terms of three basic models. First, the spillover model suggests
that one's choice of leisure is affected by interests and attitudes de
veloped during work. Second, the compensation model holds that leisure
choices are the opposite of one's work activities, thus providing sat
isfaction not realized in the work context. Third, according to the se
gmentation model, work and leisure ape distinct life domains and do no
r interact Occasionally, a fourth perspective is added: Work and leisu
re are mutually influential. Evidence for the first three perspectives
is mixed. Moreover, there is a units-of-analysis problem in studying
work and leisure; that is, what about work and leisure is comparable?
A patterned socialization model of work and leisure that encompasses a
nd augments these perspectives is presented in this article. Evidence
from the outdoor recreation activities of a sample of workers in the m
achining and tooling industries of western Pennsylvania is consistent
with the position that work and leisure influence each other and that
both are the result of prior socialization. The units-of-analysis prob
lem is solved to some extent for this group of informants by comparing
their work with machines and their leisure experiences with machines.
Finally, machinists who engage in more outdoor recreation activities
using machines are more satisfied with their leisure, in general.