Sa. Salmon et al., IN-VITRO ACTIVITY OF CEFTIOFUR AND ITS PRIMARY METABOLITE, DESFUROYLCEFTIOFUR, AGAINST ORGANISMS OF VETERINARY IMPORTANCE, Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation, 8(3), 1996, pp. 332-336
Ceftiofur (XNL) and its primary metabolite, desfuroylceftiofur (DXNL),
were evaluated for in vitro activity against 539 isolates from veteri
nary sources. Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae, Pasteurella spp., Haemo
philus somnus, Salmonella spp., Escherichia coli, staphylococci, and s
treptococci were tested. Overall, XNL and DXNL were equivalent in acti
vity against the gram-negative organisms with all minimum inhibitory c
oncentrations (MICs) within 1 serial dilution. Against the staphylococ
ci, MIC differences of 2-3 serial dilutions were detected with an MIC(
90) for XNL and DXNL of 1.0 and 4.0-8.0 mu g/ml, respectively. Althoug
h the MIC(90) obtained for Streptococcus suis for each compound was wi
thin 1 dilution, the MIC values against individual strains were 2-3 di
lutions greater for DXNL than for XNL. The MICs obtained with the bovi
ne and equine streptococci for DXNL (MIC(90) = 0.03 mu g/ml) were 5 se
rial dilutions higher than those obtained for XNL (MIC(90) less than o
r equal to 0.0019). Although DXNL was less active than XNL against the
streptococci, these differences were not clinically important because
both XNL and DXNL were highly active for these bacteria. Although the
se differences are of little importance with the streptococci, they ma
y have important implications for susceptibility testing of the staphy
lococci. In conclusion, with the exception of the staphylococci, both
XNL and DXNL were highly active against the organisms tested, with MIC
s for both compounds several fold lower than plasma levels achieved du
ring dosing of XNL.