W. Blumen et al., THE LOW-LEVEL STRUCTURE AND EVOLUTION OF A DRY ARCTIC FRONT OVER THE CENTRAL UNITED-STATES .2. COMPARISON WITH THEORY, Monthly weather review, 124(8), 1996, pp. 1676-1692
This investigation examines the meso- and microscale aspects of the 9
March 1992 cold front that passed through Kansas during the daylight h
ours. The principal feature of this front is the relatively rapid fron
togenesis that occurred. The total change in the cross-frontal tempera
ture is about 6 K, with most of the change occurring between about 082
0 and 1400 local Lime and over a relatively small subsection of the to
tal frontal width. The surface data are able to resolve a sharp horizo
ntal transition zone of 1-2 km. The principal physical processes that
produce this frontogenesis are shown to be the cross-frontal different
ial sensible heating, associated with differential cloud cover, and th
e convergence of warm and cold air toward the front. The former proces
s is responsible for an increase in the magnitude of the differential
temperature change across the front; the latter process concentrates t
he existing temperature differential across an ever-decreasing transit
ional zone until a near discontinuity in the horizontal temperature di
stribution is essentially established during the period of a few hours
. Two approaches are taken to demonstrate that these processes control
the observed frontogenesis. First, surface data from an enhanced arra
y, set up during the Storm-scale Operational and Research Meteorology
Fronts Experiment System Test, are used to evaluate the terms that con
tribute to the time rate of change of the gradient of potential temper
ature, d/del theta/\ dt, following the motion of the front. Then, the
processes of differential sensible heating and convergence are incorpo
rated into a simple two-dimensional nonlinear model that serves to pro
vide a forecast of the surface temperature and velocity fields from gi
ven initial conditions that are appropriate at the onset of the surfac
e heating. Verification of the model predictions by observed data conf
irms that both processes contribute to the observed daytime frontogene
sis on 9 March 1992. A critique of the model does, however, suggest th
at the accuracy of some quantitative evaluations could be improved.