H. Bahlburg et Kp. Furlong, LITHOSPHERIC MODELING OF THE ORDOVICIAN FORELAND BASIN IN THE PUNA OFNORTHWESTERN ARGENTINA - ON THE INFLUENCE OF ARC LOADING ON FORELAND BASIN, Tectonophysics, 259(1-3), 1996, pp. 245-258
In a qualitative sedimentological model of the Ordovician basin in the
Puna of northwestern Argentina, the temporal and spatial distribution
of predominantly marine volcanoclastic facies was interpreted to indi
cate a basin evolution from extensionally related subsidence to that d
riven by crustal down flexure, Sedimentological data were taken to ref
lect a Middle Ordovician eastward thrusting of an extinct Early Ordovi
cian are over part of its back-are basin in the course of the collisio
n of the allochthonous Arequipa Massif terrane with the South American
margin. To test the original qualitative sedimentological interpretat
ion of the Puna basin, an infinite beam elastic plate loading model wa
s applied using the constraints of the field data. Contrary to the ori
ginal interpretation, results show that the Puna basin can be modeled
as resulting entirely from the effects of lithospheric loading caused
by the progressive contruction of a static load, i.e., a volcanic are.
Two loading events, one in the Early Ordovician, and one in the Llanv
irnian, with tectonic load thicknesses of 6000 and 2000 m, respectivel
y, best explain the observed basin geometry, The onlap patterns on the
distal margin on the peripheral bulge are reproduced well using a fle
xural rigidity of 10(22) N m representing an equivalent elastic thickn
ess of 14 km of the loaded plate, Higher values for the flexural rigid
ity are considered unlikely, as they result in an enhanced peripheral
bulge which uplifts marine near-shore deposits on the distal margin to
unrealistic subaereal positions. The model results fit a foreland bas
in development where crustal thickening was caused by the construction
of a static volcanic are on a previously passive margin, Modeling the
movement of thrust loads over parts of the basin according to traditi
onal models of foreland basin formation in this case leads to model re
sults which are inconsistent with field data, even when moderate thrus
t rates are considered.