Wh. Cordell et al., COMPARISON OF INTRAVENOUS KETOROLAC, MEPERIDINE, AND BOTH (BALANCED ANALGESIA) FOR RENAL COLIC, Annals of emergency medicine, 28(2), 1996, pp. 151-158
Study objective: To compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of IV ke
torolac, the only nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug indicated for par
enteral use in acute pain in the United States, with IV meperidine and
with a combination of the two agents in renal colic. Methods: We carr
ied out a double-blind, randomized, multicenter clinical trial in the
emergency departments of four urban tertiary care teaching hospitals.
Our study subjects were 154 patients with suspected renal colic. Each
subject received an initial IV dose of ketorolac 60 mg, meperidine 50
mg, or both supplemented as needed beyond 30 minutes with additional d
oses of meperidine. Results: The main outcome measures were changes in
pain-intensity and pain-relief scores, amount of supplemental meperid
ine required, end-of-study drug tolerability, and adverse events. Anal
yses of 106 subjects with confirmed renal colic indicated that ketorol
ac and the combination were significantly better than meperidine alone
by all efficacy measures, including pain relief and time elapsed befo
re the need for supplemental meperidine. By 30 minutes, 75% of the ket
orolac group and 74% of the combination group had a 50% reduction in p
ain scores, compared with 23% of the meperidine group (P<.001). The ke
torolac and combination groups did not differ significantly in any of
the efficacy measures.Conclusion: IV ketorolac, alone or in combinatio
n with meperidine, was superior to IV meperidine alone in moderate and
severe renal colic. Because many subjects in all three treatment grou
ps received supplemental meperidine and because response to ketorolac
alone cannot be predicted, clinicians may choose to initiate treatment
with a ketorolac-meperidine combination.