An epistemological lens, developed from classical epistemology, philos
ophy of science, and cognition research, is employed to view jurisprud
ence in general, and legal studies research in particular. The dominan
t paradigm in modern times has been positivism, but it is being challe
nged by a number of potentially competing schools such as modern natur
al law, law and economics, feminist jurisprudence, and critical legal
studies. The current system of legal research protects the dominant pa
radigm against the revolution posed by these competing paradigms. Lega
l studies research and the Academy of Legal Studies in Business, on th
e other hand, offer hope for cultivating a meta-jurisprudence that cha
llenges the dominant paradigm of positivism and moves the discipline t
o a research agenda of greater social significance. The review process
es of legal studies journals, the existence of shared values within th
e discipline, and the discourse and organization of professional meeti
ngs, all encourage a meta-jurisprudence that can and should define the
discipline of legal studies.