HUMAN-IMMUNODEFICIENCY-VIRUS TYPE-1 DRUG SUSCEPTIBILITY DURING ZIDOVUDINE (AZT) MONOTHERAPY COMPARED WITH AZT PLUS 2',3'-DIDEOXYINOSINE OR AZT PLUS 2',3'-DIDEOXYCYTIDINE COMBINATION THERAPY
Ba. Larder et al., HUMAN-IMMUNODEFICIENCY-VIRUS TYPE-1 DRUG SUSCEPTIBILITY DURING ZIDOVUDINE (AZT) MONOTHERAPY COMPARED WITH AZT PLUS 2',3'-DIDEOXYINOSINE OR AZT PLUS 2',3'-DIDEOXYCYTIDINE COMBINATION THERAPY, Journal of virology, 70(9), 1996, pp. 5922-5929
Human immunodeficiency virus type I (HIV-1) isolates obtained prior to
and during a combination therapy trial comparing zidovudine (AZT; 3'-
azidothymidine) monotherapy with AZT plus 2',3'-dideoxyinosine (ddI) o
r AZT plus 2',3'-dideoxycytidine (ddC) were assessed for the developme
nt of drug resistance. Drug susceptibility was measured by using two d
ifferent phenotypic assays, one that requires infection of peripheral
blood mononuclear cells with HIV-1 isolated from cocultures and a seco
nd based on infection of HeLa CD4(+) cells with recombinant virus cont
aining the reverse transcriptase (RT) of the clinical isolate. In addi
tion, genotypic assessment of resistance was obtained by DNA sequencin
g of the RT coding region. No difference in the development of AZT res
istance was noted in isolates from individuals receiving AZT monothera
py or combination therapy. However, a low frequency of ddI or ddC resi
stance was seen in isolates from the combination arms, which may at le
ast partially explain the enhanced efficacy observed with these drug c
ombinations compared with monotherapy. It was noted from DNA sequencin
g that a relatively high frequency of the nonnucleoside RT inhibitor r
esistance mutation, codon 181 changed from encoding Tyr to encoding Cy
s, was present in some isolates both before and during nucleoside anal
og combination therapy. Since these patients were unlikely to have acc
ess to nonnucleoside RT inhibitors, it is probable that this mutation
preexisted at a reasonable level in the wild-type virus population. Co
mparisons of the AZT susceptibility assays indicated a good correlatio
n between the phenotypic and genotypic determinations. However, direct
numerical comparisons between the phenotypic assays were not reliable
, suggesting that valid comparisons of different resistance data sets
will require the use of the same assay procedure.