R. Tognetti et al., COMPARISON OF SAP FLOW, CAVITATION AND WATER STATUS OF QUERCUS-PETRAEA AND QUERCUS-CERRIS TREES WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO COMPUTER-TOMOGRAPHY, Plant, cell and environment, 19(8), 1996, pp. 928-938
Concurrent measurements of sap velocity (heat pulse) and ultrasound ac
oustic emission were performed on the trunks of mature Turkey oak (Que
rcus cerris) and sessile oak (Quercus petraea) trees, Plant water stat
us was assessed by measuring leaf water potential, leaf conductance an
d transpiration, Wood density was estimated non-destructively on the t
runk section of the plants by mobile computer tomography, which measur
es the attenuation of a collimated beam of radiation traversing the tr
unk in several directions, as the device rotates around the tree, Abso
rption is proportional to the density of the wood, As wood density is
strictly correlated to water content, this non-invasive method allows
the water content in the trunk section to be evaluated as well as mapp
ed. Leaf water potential declined each morning until a minimum was rea
ched at midday and recovered in the afternoon, lagging behind changes
in transpiration rate, Good correspondence was found between the patte
rns of sap velocity and cavitation rate, A close correlation was demon
strated between wood density, mater content and sap velocity, Sap flow
was always higher in Turkey oak than in sessile oak, Trunk signatures
by computer tomography appeared to differentiate the two oak species,
with the Turkey oak stem clearly more hydrated than the sessile oak;
water storage reservoirs could play an important role in tree survival
during extended periods of low soil water availability and in the rel
ative distribution of tree species, especially in the context of globa
l climate change. Late-wood conducting elements of oak species seem to
play a significant role in water transport, The mobile computer tomog
raph was confirmed as a peerless tool for investigating stem water rel
ations, Diurnal variations in the measured parameters under natural dr
ought conditions and the differences between the two oak species are d
iscussed.