SERUM TUMOR-MARKERS IN COLORECTAL-CANCER STAGING, GRADING, AND FOLLOW-UP

Citation
M. Plebani et al., SERUM TUMOR-MARKERS IN COLORECTAL-CANCER STAGING, GRADING, AND FOLLOW-UP, Journal of surgical oncology, 62(4), 1996, pp. 239-244
Citations number
32
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery,Oncology
ISSN journal
00224790
Volume
62
Issue
4
Year of publication
1996
Pages
239 - 244
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-4790(1996)62:4<239:STICSG>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
Early diagnosis of colorectal cancer, a frequent neoplasia in industri alized countries, permits curative surgery. In this study we assessed the clinical role of serum tumor markers determination in diagnosing, staging, and grading colorectal cancer; the role of carcinoembryonic a ntigen (CEA), CA 19-9, tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA) and CA 72-4 in colorectal cancer follow-up was also assessed. In 114 patients with c olorectal cancer, the oncofetal antigen CEA was compared with the memb rane-associated glycoproteins CA 19-9, CA 242, and CA 72-4 and with th e cytokeratins TPA, tissue polypeptide-specific antigen (TPS) and tiss ue polypeptide monoclonal antigen (TPM). Overall, the most sensitive i ndices were TPA and TPS (67% and 70%, respectively). Tumor stage influ enced the levels of CEA, CA 19-9, and TPA, but not those of TPS, while tumor grade influenced CEA and TPS, but not CA 72-4, TPA, and TPM. TP A was the most sensitive index in identifying early or well-differenti ated colorectal cancers. The sensitivity was enhanced when this marker was determined in combination with CEA, in diagnosing both advanced a nd early colorectal tumors. Seventy-seven patients were followed up af ter therapy for at least 18 months. CEA was the most sensitive index o f recurrence (58%); however, this sensitivity is too low to consider t umor markers useful in colorectal cancer follow-up. (C) 1996 Wiley-Lis s, Inc.