M. Skladany et H. Schanzer, INCREASED ARTERIAL INFLOW IN EXTREMITIES WITH CHRONIC VENOUS INSUFFICIENCY - AN IMPORTANT AND UNAPPRECIATED HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETER, Surgery, 120(1), 1996, pp. 30-33
Background. The purpose of this study runs to evalate and analyze arte
rial inflow (AI) In lower extremities of patients with symptoms of chr
onic venous insufficiency (CVI) and of members of a healthy control gr
oup. Methods. Foot mercury-in-silicone strain gauge plethysmography wa
s used to measure AI, venous reflux, and muscle pump efficiency in 388
extremities of 194 patients with symptoms of CVI. Severe stage III sy
mptoms (Society for Vascular Surgery/International Society for Cardiov
ascular Surgery classification) were present in 84 extremities, modera
te stage II symptoms were present in 81 extremities, and mild stage I
symptoms were present in 158 extremities. No symptoms, stage 0, were f
ound in 65 contralateral extremities of patients with unilateral sympt
oms. Identical parameters were measured in 70 extremities of 35 health
y subjects in a control group. AI in each staged group was compared wi
th that of the control group and with that of the other groups with sy
mptoms with the use of Kruskall-Wallis analysis of multiple variances.
Results. The mean AI (+/-SD) in milliliters per 100 ml of foot tissue
per minute in the extremities in the control group tons 0.82 +/- 0.48
. In the extremities without symptoms, contralateral to those with sym
toms in patients with unilateral disease, the AI was 1.24 +/- 0.88. In
extremities with mild symptoms the AI was 1.54 +/- 1.20, in extremiti
es with moderate symptoms it was 2.88 +/- 1.70, and in extremities wit
h severe symptoms if was 6.25 +/- 4.91. The AI was significantly incre
ased in all extremities of patients with CVI (stages 0 to III) wizen c
ompared with that of patients in the control group. Extremities with s
tage II and III disease had significantly higher AI than did extremiti
es zuith stage 0 and stage I disease. The difference in AI between ext
remities with stage 0 and I disease was not statistically significant,
and no significant difference in Al was seen between extremities with
stage II and III disease. Conclusions. When plethysmographic methods
are used to evaluate extremities zuith CVI high AI, if not considered
can overrepresent the true magnitude of reflux. High AI may indicate p
resence of primary anatomic arterioventricular fistulas, or it may be
the consequence of inflammatory changes and secondary functional arter
ioventricular shunting. Increased AI in contralateral extremities with
no symptoms may point to the role of high flow in the pathogenesis of
CVI. Clarification of this question requires further investigation.