Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the results of duple
x ultrasonography and magnetic resonance angiography in the evaluation
of carotid artery stenosis to determine whether ultrasonography alone
is sufficient for preoperative evaluation. Methods: This study consis
ted of a retrospective review of 33 patients who underwent 35 carotid
endarterectomies. A total of 66 vessels were studied by both duplex ul
trasonography and magnetic resonance angiography, and an overall corre
lation between the two studies was determined. Results:A high correlat
ion was found between duplex and magnetic resonance angiography with a
n r coefficient equal to 0.87 (Pearson's correlation coefficient) and
kappa = 0.75. Discrepancies between the two studies or the presence of
intracranial disease did not alter surgical decision making. Conclusi
on: Duplex ultrasonography alone can accurately determine the degree o
f internal carotid artery stenosis and when paired with careful clinic
al evaluation is a reliable and cost-effective method for evaluating s
urgical carotid disease.