J. Golledge et al., INFLUENCE OF PATIENT-RELATED VARIABLES ON THE OUTCOME OF CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY, Journal of vascular surgery, 24(1), 1996, pp. 120-126
Purpose: Variability in outcome after carotid endarterectomy is well r
ecognized. This study examines the importance of patient-related facto
rs in determining outcome. Methods: Four hundred and sixty consecutive
patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic severe (60
% to 99%) internal carotid stenosis performed by one vascular surgeon
have been studied prospectively. Patients were followed-up at 3, 6, 9,
and 12 months and then yearly. Pre-, intra-, and perioperative detail
s and follow-up information were entered on a database. Results: Multi
ple logistic regression identified a number of factors significantly a
ssociated with death and stroke. A history of crescendo transient isch
emic attacks (TIAs) (p = 0.003, p = 0.0002) and being female (p = 0.03
, p = 0.0001) were associated with both perioperative death and stroke
within 30 days of operation, respectively. Deaths between 1 and 36 mo
nths were associated with ischemic heart disease (p = 0.03) and diabet
es (p = 0.04), whereas stroke was associated with small internal carot
id diameter (p = 0.02). The importance of symptoms at presentation on
outcome was further emphasized by life-table analysis. In 98% of patie
nts with amaurosis fugax, only 67% of those with crescendo TIAs were a
live at 18 months (p < 0.01). The survival of patients with amaurosis
was significantly better than those with TIAs (p < 0.01), transient st
roke (p < 0.01), and progressive stroke (p < 0.05). Similarly, postope
rative stroke was significantly more common for patients with crescend
o TIAs than those with amaurosis (p < 0.01), established stroke (p < 0
.05), and TIA (p < 0.05). Transient stroke was associated with a poor
outcome, with only 66% of patients being alive at 36 months and 14% ha
ving suffered a stroke (p < 0.05 compared with established stroke). Co
nclusion: Presenting symptoms significantly predict outcome after caro
tid endarterectomy. This should be considered both in patient selectio
n and comparison of patient series.