A. Verneuil et al., EFFECTS OF DRIVING PRESSURE AND RECURRENT LARYNGEAL NERVE-STIMULATIONON GLOTTIC VIBRATION IN A CONSTANT-PRESSURE MODEL, Otolaryngology and head and neck surgery, 115(1), 1996, pp. 15-23
Glottic phonatory parameters have been studied in constant flow models
; however, the lung-thorax system is better viewed as a constant press
ure source, Adjusting the driving pressure and recurrent laryngeal ner
ve stimulation as independent variables, rather than as dependent vari
ables, may provide a more physiologic understanding of laryngeal funct
ion and glottic parameters, including subglottic pressure, airflow, fu
ndamental frequency, and glottic area. In three dogs subglottic pressu
re and airflow were measured in two separate conditions: with constant
recurrent laryngeal nerve stimulation and varying driving pressure, a
nd with constant driving pressure and varying recurrent laryngeal nerv
e stimulation. Videostroboscopic measures on four dogs assessed glotti
c areas with constant recurrent laryngeal nerve stimulation at differe
nt driving pressures. With constant recurrent laryngeal nerve stimulat
ion, increasing driving pressure had no effect on glottic areas, where
as subglottic pressure, fundamental frequency, and airflow increased s
ignificantly. However, changes in subglottic pressure were minimal in
comparison with changes in driving pressure. At constant driving press
ure, increasing recurrent laryngeal nerve stimulation increased subglo
ttic pressure and fundamental frequency and decreased airflow, These f
indings suggest that during phonation subglottic pressure is primarily
dependent on recurrent laryngeal nerve stimulation and laryngeal musc
ular contraction, but not on lung driving pressure.