Pk. Hendrix et al., EPIDURAL ADMINISTRATION OF BUPIVACAINE, MORPHINE, OR THEIR COMBINATION FOR POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA IN DOGS, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 209(3), 1996, pp. 598
Objective-To compare the analgesic effects of epidural administration
of morphine (MOR), bupivacaine hydrochloride (BUP), their combination
(COM), and 0.9% sterile NaCl solution (SAL) in dogs undergoing hind li
mb orthopedic surgeries.Design-Blinded, randomized clinical trial. Ani
mals-41 healthy dogs admitted for elective orthopedic surgeries involv
ing the pelvis or hind limbs. Procedure-Analgesic and control agents w
ere administered postoperatively prior to recovery from isoflurane ane
sthesia. Ten dogs received MOR, 0.1 mg/kg of body weight; 10 received
BUP, 0.5%, 1 ml/10-cm distance from the occipital protuberance to the
lumbosacral space; 11 received COM; and 10 received SAL epidurally. Do
gs were monitored for 24 hours after epidural injection for pain score
, heart and respiratory rates, blood pressure, time to required admini
stration of supplemental analgesic agent, total number of supplemental
doses of analgesic agent required, and plasma concentrations of corti
sol, MOR, and BUP. Results-Pain scores were significantly lower in dog
s in the COM and BUP groups than in dogs in the SAL group. Pain scores
also were significantly lower in dogs in the COM group than in dogs i
n the MOR group. Time to required administration of supplemental analg
esic agent was longer for dogs in the COM group than for dogs in the M
OR and SAL groups. Total number of supplemental doses of analgesic age
nt required was lower for dogs in the BUP and COM groups than for dogs
in the SAL group. Clinical Implications-Postoperative epidural admini
stration of COM or BUP alone provides longer-lasting analgesia, compar
ed with MOR or SAL.