Background. If lungs could be retrieved for transplantation after circ
ulatory arrest, the shortage of donors might be significantly alleviat
ed. However, in such non-heart-beating donors, there is great concern
that even a short period of warm ischemia will be deleterious for lung
tissue, jeopardizing the transplant recipient. It was the purpose of
this study to look for the efficacy of different methods of lung cooli
ng inside a cadaver after circulatory arrest. Methods. New Zealand whi
te rabbits were sacrificed with an intravenous overdose of pentobarbit
al and left at room temperature. Subcutaneous, rectal, lung core, lung
surface, and endobronchial temperatures were measured at intervals af
ter death. Cooling of the lung during ischemia differed between groups
(n = 6 in each group): lungs left deflated at room temperature (24 de
grees C) (group 1 = control non-heart-beating donors), lungs ventilate
d with cooled (4 degrees C) room air (group 2), lungs left deflated pl
us topical cooling (1 degrees C) of both the cadaver and its lungs (gr
oup 3), and lungs flushed in situ immediately after circulatory arrest
with a cold (4 degrees C) crystalloid solution followed by ex vivo de
flated storage in cold (1 degrees C) saline solution (group 4 = contro
l heart-beating donors). Results. There was a slow decline in lung cor
e, lung surface, and endobronchial temperatures toward room temperatur
e in group 1 (1.5 degrees +/- 0.0 degrees C/h, 1.8 degrees +/- 0.2 deg
rees C/h, and 1.9 degrees 10.1 degrees C/h, respectively). In contrast
, all three lung temperatures immediately (<5 minutes) dropped to less
than 10 degrees C in group 4. Hypothermic ventilation (group 2) decre
ased endobronchial temperature (p < 0.05 at 30 minutes) but not lung s
urface, rectal, or subcutaneous temperature when compared with group 1
. Cooling rate for lung surface and endobronchial temperatures during
the first 4 hours after death was faster (p < 0.01) in group 3 (6.6 de
grees +/- 0.3 degrees C/h and 6.1 degrees +/- 0.2 degrees C/h, respect
ively) when compared with group 2 (2.5 degrees +/- 0.3 degrees C/h and
3.9 degrees +/- 0.1 degrees C/h, respectively), but slower (p < 0.001
) when compared with group 4 (9.2 degrees +/- 0.1 degrees C/h and 8.7
degrees +/- 0.1 degrees C/h, respectively). Conclusions. These data de
monstrate that in the non-heart-beating donor, (1) in situ cold flush
will result in immediate cooling of the lung, (2) Ventilation with coo
led air will only accelerate the decline in endobronchial temperature
but has no effect on lung surface temperature, and (3) topical cooling
of the cadaver is more efficacious in decreasing lung temperature tha
n hypothermic ventilation.