The theory of social representations is primarily a theory of lay know
ledge. It is argued that it employs polar concepts of the post-Hegelia
n social science in which the opposite components of such concepts are
mutually interdependent. The focus of this paper is on polarities suc
h as individual/social, implicit/explicit and unconscious/conscious. T
he theory of social representations is conceptually compatible with th
e socio-cultural theories of knowledge. The socio-cultural theories of
knowledge imply that in order to become an independent thinker, the c
hild or the scientist must conceptually free themselves, at least part
ly, from the constraints of their symbolic social environment. The the
ory of social representations, in contrast, studies how the social sym
bolic social environment arrests the individual in the existing forms
of thinking, prohibits him or her fi-om independent thought and enforc
es a particular manner of conceiving the world, events and objects. Fi
nally, attention is drawn to the multilayered nature of thought and to
its methodological implications.