CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETIC PEARLS - BOLUS VERSUS INFUSION EQUATIONS

Citation
Je. Murphy et Me. Winter, CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETIC PEARLS - BOLUS VERSUS INFUSION EQUATIONS, Pharmacotherapy, 16(4), 1996, pp. 698-700
Citations number
5
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Pharmacy
Journal title
ISSN journal
02770008
Volume
16
Issue
4
Year of publication
1996
Pages
698 - 700
Database
ISI
SICI code
0277-0008(1996)16:4<698:CPP-BV>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
Using a nonprogrammed calculator to solve lengthy pharmacokinetic equa tions is time consuming and carries the potential for entry error. Sho rter equations reduce both the time and the risk. The aminoglycosides and vancomycin are usually administered as short infusions. The pharma cokinetic equation describing multiple-dose administration of short in fusions is much longer than the corresponding equation for bolus dosin g. This study examined the percentage errors that would occur using th e bolus equation instead of the infusion equation at various drug half -lives. When the half-life is 5 or more times the duration of infusion , the error in predicting concentration is 6.8% or less. Although clin icians should make their own decisions on how much error is acceptable and whether introducing guaranteed error is appropriate to save time and reduce risk of potential error, it appears that the simpler bolus equation may be used safely when the half-life is at least 5 times the duration of the infusion.