SHORT-TERM EFFECTS OF FOOD PROTEIN-CONTENT ON SUBSEQUENT DIET SELECTION BY CHICKENS AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF ALTERNATE FEEDING OF HIGH-PROTEIN AND LOW-PROTEIN FOODS
Jm. Forbes et F. Shariatmadari, SHORT-TERM EFFECTS OF FOOD PROTEIN-CONTENT ON SUBSEQUENT DIET SELECTION BY CHICKENS AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF ALTERNATE FEEDING OF HIGH-PROTEIN AND LOW-PROTEIN FOODS, British Poultry Science, 37(3), 1996, pp. 597-607
1. Growing male chickens of broiler and layer strains were allowed to
eat either a high-protein food (LP) or a low-protein food (LP) for 10
min after an overnight fast and then offered a choice between HP and L
P. During the next hour they ate significantly more of the food other
than the initial meal. Similar results were obtained when there was a
gap of 45 min without food between the initial meal and the choice per
iod. 2. When the initial meal was given by tube into the crop, followe
d by 45 min without food, there was no significant effect on subsequen
t diet selection. These results show that it is necessary for the bird
s to eat the food themselves for it to exert its effect on subsequent
choice. 3. Birds with experience of eating two foods identical in nutr
ient composition but different in colour did not select either food in
preference to the other following an initial meal of one alone. This
is evidence against the possibility that neophagia accounts for the re
sults of the first two experiments. When an initial meal of low protei
n food was followed by a choice of high and low protein foods, birds a
te a greater proportion of the high protein when it was placed on the
opposite side of the cage from that in which the initial meal was give
n. Thus they are not choosing a food simply by its position within the
cage. 4. To see the extent to which broilers can extend their ability
to compensate for protein content over several weeks, male broilers w
ere given one of 4 treatments from 5 to 10 weeks of age: (A) HP and LP
concurrently; (B) HP and LP on alternate days; (C) HP in the morning
and LP in the afternoon, (D) LP in the morning and HP in the afternoon
. There was no significant effect of treatment on food intake, body we
ight gain or carcase protein content but carcases were significantly l
ess fat after treatment (B) than treatment (D). 5. It is concluded tha
t growing broiler chicks can compensate well for periods of access to
only a low-protein food, by subsequent intake of a high-protein food,
and vice versa, as long as they are able to gauge the sensory properti
es of the foods. Offering two complementary foods in alternating half-
day periods is an effective method of choice-feeding, allowing birds t
o select a diet to meet the requirements for growth.