Cardiac output (Q), heart rate (HR), blood pressure, and oxygen consum
ption (Vo(2)) were measured repeatedly both at rest and at two levels
of exercise in six subjects during microgravity exposure. Exercise was
at 30 and 60% of the workload producing the individual's maximal Vo(2
) in 1 G. Three of the subjects were on a 9-day flight, Spacelab Life
Sciences-1, and three were on a 15-day flight, Spacelab Life Sciences-
2. We found no temporal differences during the flights. Thus we have c
ombined all microgravity measure: ments to compare in-fight values wit
h erect or supine control values. At rest, Q in flight was 126% of Q e
rect (P < 0.01) but was not different from Q supine. and HR in flight
was 81% of HR erect (P < 0.01) and 91% of HR supine (P < 0.05), Thus r
esting stroke volume (SV in flight was 155% of SV erect (P < 0.01) and
109% SV supine (P < 0.05). Resting mean arterial blood pressure and d
iastolic pressure were lower in flight than erect (P < 0.05), Exercise
values were considered as functions of Vo(2). The increase in Q with
Vo(2) in flight was less than that at 1 G (slope 3.5 vs. 6 1 . min(-1)
. l(-1). min(-1). SV in flight fell with Increasing Vo(2), whereas SV
erect rose and SV supine remained constant. The blood pressure respons
e to exercise was not different in flight from erector supine. We conc
lude that true microgravity causes a cardiovascular response different
from that seen during any of its putative simulations.