M. Haskell et al., THE EFFECT OF SUBSTRATE-ENRICHED AND SUBSTRATE-IMPOVERISHED HOUSING ENVIRONMENTS ON THE DIVERSITY OF BEHAVIOR IN PIGS, Behaviour, 133, 1996, pp. 741-761
In intensive farming situations, growing animals are housed in relativ
ely barren environments. The lack of opportunity to perform substrate-
interactive and manipulative behaviour patterns may affect the express
ion and organization of these behaviours. However, making direct compa
risons of the behaviour expressed in environments of differing physica
l complexity is difficult. In this experiment a relative diversity ind
ex was used ro compare the behavioural repertoires of pigs housed in t
wo different environments for a period of five months. One group of pi
gs (substrate-enriched) had straw, forest bark and branches added to t
he standard pens and the other group (substrate-impoverished) did not.
The pigs were individually housed, and their behaviour was focal samp
led in these pens on one day each month. It was shown that the relativ
e diversity of manipulative behaviour shown by the pigs in the substra
te-impoverished environment was lower than in the pigs in the substrat
e-enriched environment (p < 0.05). The relative diversity of the whole
behavioural repertoire shown by the pigs in the substrate-impoverishe
d environment also tended to be lower than that in the substrate-enric
hed environment (p = 0.06). It is concluded that this may be due to a
difference between the two groups in motivation to interact with and m
anipulate objects, or a function of the manipulable quality of the sub
strates available to them. Alternatively, exposure to substrate-impove
rished environments may interfere with the ability to express manipula
tive behaviour. Both situations pose a threat to the welfare of growin
g pigs resident in barren environments.