D. Trafimow et Ka. Finlay, THE IMPORTANCE OF SUBJECTIVE NORMS FOR A MINORITY OF PEOPLE - BETWEEN-SUBJECTS AND WITHIN-SUBJECTS ANALYSES, Personality & social psychology bulletin, 22(8), 1996, pp. 820-828
Intentions to perform most behaviors are more controlled by attitudes
than by subjective norms. Yet subjective norms typically account for a
significant, albeit small, proportion of unique variance in intention
s. To explore the hypothesis that this effect can be explained largely
by individual differences in the degree to which some people are apt
to be more under normative control, subjects were asked to indicate th
eir intentions, attitudes, and subjective norms toward performing 30 b
ehaviors. Between-subjects and within-subjects analyses were performed
. The within-subjects analyses revealed important differences in, whet
her subjects are under attitudinal or normative control across the beh
aviors. Further, when ''normatively controlled'' subjects were exclude
d from the sample, the significant effects of subjective norms on inte
ntions that were obtained in previous between-subjects analyses were e
liminated, and the attitudinal effects were augmented. Finally, this i
ndividual difference was associated with the strength of the collectiv
e self.