Sixty male offenders newly admitted to a secure psychiatric setting ma
de a variety of attributional ratings concerning their own offense and
the offenses of eight other offenders. A nonoffender control subject
was yoked to each offender by being given the latter's history and off
ense description to explain and rate. In addition, control subjects ev
aluated the eight standard history and offense descriptions. There wer
e no differences in the ratings of the standard crime and history desc
riptions between offenders and their yoked controls, except that offen
ders rated the causes of other offenders' crimes as less stable and ot
hers' likelihood of reoffending as lower than did nonoffenders. As pre
dicted, personality-disordered stimulus offenders were rated as more b
lameworthy, more likely to reoffend, and more responsible for their cr
imes than psychotic stimulus offenders. Offenders rated themselves as
less likely to reoffend than their yoked controls rated them.